A US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900′s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time.
The allegations stemming from the American Institution of Alternative Archeology (AIAA) that the Smithsonian Institution had destroyed thousands of giant human remains during the early 1900′s was not taken lightly by the Smithsonian who responded by suing the organization for defamation and trying to damage the reputation of the 168-year old institution.
During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several Smithsonian whistle blowers admitted to the existence of documents that allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream archeology can not admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA spokesman, James Churward.
“There has been a major cover up by western archaeological institutions since the early 1900′s to make us believe that America was first colonized by Asian peoples migrating through the Bering Strait 15,000 years ago, when in fact, there are hundreds of thousands of burial mounds all over America which the Natives claim were there a long time before them, and that show traces of a highly developed civilization, complex use of metal alloys and where giant human skeleton remains are frequently found but still go unreported in the media and news outlets,” he explains.
A turning point of the court case was when a 1.3 meter long human femur bone was shown as evidence in court of the existence of such giant human bones.
The evidence came as a blow to the Smithsonian’s lawyers as the bone had been stolen from the Smithsonian by one of their high level curators in the mid 1930′s who had kept the bone all his life and which had admitted on his deathbed in writing of the undercover operations of the Smithsonian.
“It is a terrible thing that is being done to the American people,” he wrote in the letter.
“We are hiding the truth about the forefathers of humanity, our ancestors, the giants who roamed the earth as recalled in the Bible and ancient texts of the world.”
The US Supreme Court has since forced the Smithsonian Institution to publicly release classified information about anything related to the “destruction of evidence pertaining to the mound builder culture” and to elements “relative to human skeletons of greater height than usual”, a ruling the AIAA is extremely enthused about.
“The public release of these documents will help archaeologists and historians to reevaluate current theories about human evolution and help us greater our understanding of the mound builder culture in America and around the world,” explains AIAA director, Hans Guttenberg.
“Finally, after over a century of lies, the truth about our giant ancestors shall be revealed to the world” he acknowledges, visibly satisfied by the court ruling.
The documents are scheduled to be released in 2015 and the operation will be coordinated by an independent scientific organization to assure political neutrality.
The Evidence — Supporting Documents
by Nita Hiltner
The entire conspiracy theory revolving around the existence of ancient giants or Nephilim lies with the Smithsonian’s insistence that no physical specimens of such creatures remain.
Those who choose to discredit stories of Nephilim argue that since there’s no physical evidence to analyze – giants never existed but hundreds and perhaps thousands of newspaper accounts from the 19th and early 20th century say otherwise.
Also contrary to popular belief – the Smithsonian does in fact have records of abnormally long skeletons on file but to add more fuel to the fire of those who support the theory of giants, the Smithsonian now claims that the physical remains associated with those official documents have also been lost.
Published in 1894 the 12th Annual Report from the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian – written by Cyrus Thomas and Thomas Powell, who where agents for that bureau, contains several verifiable accounts of large, 7-9 feet tall humanistic skeletal remains found right here in the United States. One particular example was logged in Roane County, Tennessee:
“Underneath [a] layer of shells the earth was very dark and appeared to be mixed with vegetable mold to the depth of 1 foot. At the bottom of this, resting on the original surface of the ground, was a very large skeleton lying horizontally at full length.
“Although very soft, the bones were sufficiently distinct to allow of careful measurement before attempting to remove them. The length from the base of the skull to the bones of the toes was found to be 7 feet 3 inches. It is probable, therefore, that this individual when living was fully 7½ feet high.”
The relevant portion from the excerpt above can be found on page 362, and is pictured below:
Within that same report is reference to another presumed Indian burial mound located in Dunlieth, Illinois:
“Near the original surface, 10 or 12 feet from the center, on the lower side, lying at full length on its back, was one of the largest skeletons discovered by the Bureau agents, the length as proved by actual measurement being between 7 and 8 feet. It was clearly traceable, but crumbled to pieces immediately after removal from the hard earth in which it was encased…”
Page 113 of the report features the corroborating text:
That PDF file can be downloaded from the Smithsonian archives in it’s entirety here, but it’s very large, around 900 pages – and the entire document has to be downloaded in order to view a few select pages.
A much easier way to navigate the file is using Google Books. This particular edition is located on Google Books here. (links directly to page 113 and the above text. For page 362 just use the functions to navigate to that page.)
Below are just a few of the various newspaper clippings one can expect to encounter when searching online databases, such as the library of congress.
Check out the newspaper clippings bellow: